- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- NU25 MCT UL vs Actik Core
Nitecore NU25 MCT UL vs Petzl Actik Core
What NU25 MCT UL does better (2) and where Actik Core wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.1Brightness & throw5.4
3.5Battery & charging5.0
8.8Build & durability8.3
Why is NU25 MCT UL better than Actik Core?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)132 m vs 115 m+15%
- Peak beam intensity4,360 cd vs 3,310 cd+32%
Why is Actik Core better than NU25 MCT UL?
- Maximum runtime45 h vs 100 h2.2×
- Maximum output400 lm vs 625 lm+56%
- Battery capacity700 mAh vs 1,250 mAh+79%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 400 lm | 625 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,360 cd | 3,310 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 132 m | 115 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AAA |
| Number of batteries | 1 | 3 |
| Battery capacity | 700 mAh | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 45 h | 100 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 2 m |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
