- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- NU25 MCT UL vs HL900
Nitecore NU25 MCT UL vs Simond HL900
What NU25 MCT UL does better (3) and where HL900 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.1Brightness & throw8.5
3.5Battery & charging3.5
8.8Build & durability4.2
5.9Features5.9
Why is NU25 MCT UL better than HL900?
- Maximum runtime45 h vs 30 h+50%
- Submersible to2 m vs 1 m2×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
Why is HL900 better than NU25 MCT UL?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)132 m vs 200 m+52%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 400 lm | — |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,360 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 132 m | 200 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Battery capacity | 700 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 45 h | 30 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 1 m |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Red, Black |
