- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- NU25 MCT vs SWIFT LT
Nitecore NU25 MCT vs Petzl SWIFT LT
What NU25 MCT does better (4) and where SWIFT LT wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is NU25 MCT better than SWIFT LT?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)132 m vs 70 m+89%
- Peak beam intensity4,351 cd vs 1,220 cd3.6×
- Charging time1 h vs 3 h3×
- Maximum output400 lm vs 380 lm+5%
Why is SWIFT LT better than NU25 MCT?
- Maximum runtime45 h vs 60 h+33%
- Battery capacity700 mAh vs 880 mAh+26%
- Weight50 g vs 43 g+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 400 lm | 380 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,351 cd | 1,220 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 132 m | 70 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 700 mAh | 880 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 45 h | 60 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | 1 h | 3 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 50 g | 43 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black, White | — |
