- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- NU25 MCT vs Tikka Core
Nitecore NU25 MCT vs Petzl Tikka Core
What NU25 MCT does better (4) and where Tikka Core wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Brightness & throw4.0
4.2Battery & charging5.3
Why is NU25 MCT better than Tikka Core?
- Peak beam intensity4,351 cd vs 1,410 cd3.1×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)132 m vs 75 m+76%
- Weight50 g vs 84 g+68%
- Charging time1 h vs 3.5 h3.5×
Why is Tikka Core better than NU25 MCT?
- Maximum runtime45 h vs 110 h2.4×
- Battery capacity700 mAh vs 1,250 mAh+79%
- Maximum output400 lm vs 450 lm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 400 lm | 450 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,351 cd | 1,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 132 m | 75 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 150 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AAA |
| Battery capacity | 700 mAh | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 45 h | 110 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | 1 h | 3.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 50 g | 84 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black, White | — |
