- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- NU31 vs Flex Wear
Nitecore NU31 vs Scangrip Flex Wear
What NU31 does better (5) and where Flex Wear wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is NU31 better than Flex Wear?
- Maximum output550 lm vs 150 lm3.7×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)145 m vs 45 m3.2×
- Maximum runtime147 h vs 4 h36.8×
- Battery capacity1,800 mAh vs 800 mAh2.2×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%
Why is Flex Wear better than NU31?
Flex Wear has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 550 lm | 150 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 5,260 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 145 m | 45 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 4 | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,800 mAh | 800 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 147 h | 4 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx4 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Head diameter / width | 130 mm | — |
| Weight | 96 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
