- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- NU33 vs Actik Core
Nitecore NU33 vs Petzl Actik Core
What NU33 does better (6) and where Actik Core wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Brightness & throw5.4
7.9Battery & charging5.0
5.0Build & durability8.3
Why is NU33 better than Actik Core?
- Battery capacity2,000 mAh vs 1,250 mAh+60%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)135 m vs 115 m+17%
- Maximum output700 lm vs 625 lm+12%
- Maximum runtime147 h vs 100 h+47%
- Charging time1 h vs 3.5 h3.5×
- Peak beam intensity4,578 cd vs 3,310 cd+38%
Why is Actik Core better than NU33?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
- Weight96 g vs 88 g+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 700 lm | 625 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,578 cd | 3,310 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 135 m | 115 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | 2,000 mAh | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 147 h | 100 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | 1 h | 3.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 96 g | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
