- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- NWH20 vs Actik Core
Nitecore NWH20 vs Petzl Actik Core
What NWH20 does better (0) and where Actik Core wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Brightness & throw5.4
4.7Battery & charging5.0
4.7Build & durability8.3
Why is NWH20 better than Actik Core?
NWH20 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Actik Core better than NWH20?
- Maximum runtime51 h vs 100 h+96%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)89 m vs 115 m+29%
- Weight149 g vs 88 g+69%
- Peak beam intensity1,980 cd vs 3,310 cd+67%
- Maximum output600 lm vs 625 lm+4%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 625 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,980 cd | 3,310 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 89 m | 115 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | Yes | — |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 4 | — |
| Colour temperature | 4,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 51 h | 100 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 149 g | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | Yes | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
