- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- NWH20 vs PIXA R
Nitecore NWH20 vs Petzl PIXA R
What NWH20 does better (1) and where PIXA R wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is NWH20 better than PIXA R?
- Maximum runtime51 h vs 12 h4.2×
Why is PIXA R better than NWH20?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
- Weight149 g vs 130 g+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,980 cd | 2,020 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 89 m | 90 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | Yes | — |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 4 | — |
| Colour temperature | 4,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 51 h | 12 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 149 g | 130 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black, Yellow |
