- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TrailSight vs Oclip 2 Ultra
Nitecore TrailSight vs Olight Oclip 2 Ultra
What TrailSight does better (4) and where Oclip 2 Ultra wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Brightness & throw3.0
4.8Battery & charging6.2
5.3Build & durability4.5
Why is TrailSight better than Oclip 2 Ultra?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)530 m vs 130 m4.1×
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 580 lm2.1×
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 600 mAh6.7×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
Why is Oclip 2 Ultra better than TrailSight?
- Maximum runtime46 h vs 144 h3.1×
- Weight121 g vs 80 g+51%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 580 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 70,347 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 530 m | 130 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | NiteLab UHi 20 | — |
| LED maker | NiteLab | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 4 |
| Colour temperature | 4,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 46 h | 144 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 1.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx6 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Body material | Magnesium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 92.3 mm |
| Weight | 121 g | 80 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
