- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- UT27 MCT vs HL900
Nitecore UT27 MCT vs Simond HL900
What UT27 MCT does better (0) and where HL900 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is UT27 MCT better than HL900?
UT27 MCT has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is HL900 better than UT27 MCT?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)167 m vs 200 m+20%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx7+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 800 lm | — |
| Peak beam intensity | 6,970 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 167 m | 200 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | — |
| Maximum runtime | — | 30 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx7 |
| Submersible to | — | 1 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 74 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Red, Black |
