How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 11, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Bonito vs Shark

Oceama Bonito vs Oceama Shark

What Bonito does better (3) and where Shark wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Oceama Bonito
Oceama · 2024Bonito
9.0Score
3 advantages≈ $160
Higher score
vs
Oceama Shark
Oceama · 2024Shark
8.2Score
1 advantage≈ $260
6.4Brightness & throw8.8
6.3Battery & charging4.5
9.7Build & durability3.0

Why is Bonito better than Shark?

  1. Weight210 g vs 496 g2.4×
  2. Maximum runtime2 h vs 1.5 h+33%
  3. Submersible to200 m vs 100 m2×

Why is Shark better than Bonito?

  1. Maximum output1,200 lm vs 2,500 lm2.1×
Specifications

Side by side

Oceama BonitoOceama Bonito≈ $1609.0
Oceama SharkOceama Shark≈ $2608.2
Light output
Maximum output1,200 lm2,500 lm
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitter—Cree XHP50.2
LED maker—Cree
Battery & charging
BatteryBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po26650 Li-ion
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Maximum runtime2 h1.5 h
RechargeableYesYes
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Submersible to200 m100 m
Body materialAluminiumAluminium
Size & weight
Length / height142 mm200 mm
Weight210 g496 g
Modes & features
SOS / beacon—Yes
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare