- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- 2610 Zone 0 vs Nao LT
Peli 2610 Zone 0 vs Petzl Nao LT
What 2610 Zone 0 does better (0) and where Nao LT wins (2) — every spec side by side.
2.1Brightness & throw4.3
Why is 2610 Zone 0 better than Nao LT?
2610 Zone 0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Nao LT better than 2610 Zone 0?
- Maximum output30 lm vs 600 lm20×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)28 m vs 75 m2.7×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 30 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 1,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 28 m | 75 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 3 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AAA |
| Number of batteries | 3 | 3 |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 85 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 38 mm | — |
| Weight | — | 90 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
