- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- ATEX 2755 Z0 vs PIXA R
Peli ATEX 2755 Z0 vs Petzl PIXA R
What ATEX 2755 Z0 does better (1) and where PIXA R wins (2) — every spec side by side.
2.5Brightness & throw5.0
Why is ATEX 2755 Z0 better than PIXA R?
- Maximum runtime16 h vs 12 h+33%
Why is PIXA R better than ATEX 2755 Z0?
- Maximum output115 lm vs 600 lm5.2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)61 m vs 90 m+48%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 115 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 2,020 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 61 m | 90 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 16 h | 12 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 130 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | Black, Yellow |
