- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- ATEX 2755 Z0 vs Xena
Peli ATEX 2755 Z0 vs Petzl Xena
What ATEX 2755 Z0 does better (0) and where Xena wins (3) — every spec side by side.
2.6Brightness & throw8.2
Why is ATEX 2755 Z0 better than Xena?
ATEX 2755 Z0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Xena better than ATEX 2755 Z0?
- Maximum output115 lm vs 1,400 lm12.2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)61 m vs 170 m2.8×
- Maximum runtime16 h vs 75 h4.7×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 115 lm | 1,400 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 7,220 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 61 m | 170 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | — |
| Number of batteries | — | 4 |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,200 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 16 h | 75 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 4 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Submersible to | — | 1 m |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Head diameter / width | — | 100 mm |
| Weight | — | 185 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
