- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- ATEX 2755 Z0 vs I-Match 3
Peli ATEX 2755 Z0 vs Scangrip I-Match 3
What ATEX 2755 Z0 does better (1) and where I-Match 3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.5Brightness & throw3.2
Why is ATEX 2755 Z0 better than I-Match 3?
- Maximum runtime16 h vs 15 h+7%
Why is I-Match 3 better than ATEX 2755 Z0?
- Maximum output115 lm vs 250 lm2.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 115 lm | 250 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 61 m | — |
| Light source | LED | COB LED panel |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | — |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 16 h | 15 h |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 1.5 m |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 100 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | — |
