- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Actik Core vs PIXA R
Petzl Actik Core vs Petzl PIXA R
What Actik Core does better (5) and where PIXA R wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.4Brightness & throw4.6
5.0Battery & charging2.5
8.3Build & durability7.3
Why is Actik Core better than PIXA R?
- Maximum runtime100 h vs 12 h8.3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)115 m vs 90 m+28%
- Peak beam intensity3,310 cd vs 2,020 cd+64%
- Weight88 g vs 130 g+48%
- Maximum output625 lm vs 600 lm+4%
Why is PIXA R better than Actik Core?
PIXA R has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 625 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 3,310 cd | 2,020 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 115 m | 90 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 120 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 3 | — |
| Battery capacity | 1,250 mAh | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 100 h | 12 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | 3.5 h | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 2 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 88 g | 130 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black, Yellow |
