- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- ACTIK red 400 vs Nao LT
Petzl ACTIK red 400 vs Petzl Nao LT
What ACTIK red 400 does better (2) and where Nao LT wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Brightness & throw4.3
6.8Battery & charging4.6
5.9Features5.9
Why is ACTIK red 400 better than Nao LT?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)100 m vs 75 m+33%
- Maximum runtime100 h vs 85 h+18%
Why is Nao LT better than ACTIK red 400?
- Maximum output450 lm vs 600 lm+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 450 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 1,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 100 m | 75 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 100 h | 85 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 90 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Colours | Red, Black | — |
