- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Iko Core vs Nao LT
Petzl Iko Core vs Petzl Nao LT
What Iko Core does better (2) and where Nao LT wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is Iko Core better than Nao LT?
- Weight79 g vs 90 g+14%
- Charging time3 h vs 3.5 h+17%
Why is Nao LT better than Iko Core?
- Maximum output500 lm vs 600 lm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 500 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 1,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 75 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | 1,250 mAh | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 85 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | 3 h | 3.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 79 g | 90 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
