- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- EcoPro20 vs Lite 400 A
Philips EcoPro20 vs Scangrip Lite 400 A
What EcoPro20 does better (2) and where Lite 400 A wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Brightness & throw5.6
3.4Battery & charging2.1
2.9Build & durability3.4
Why is EcoPro20 better than Lite 400 A?
- Weight385 g vs 820 g2.1×
- Maximum runtime3.5 h vs 3 h+17%
Why is Lite 400 A better than EcoPro20?
- Maximum output220 lm vs 400 lm+82%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx0 vs IPx4
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 220 lm | 400 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 120 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | — |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Battery capacity | 1,800 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 3.5 h | 3 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | No | — |
| Charging time | 3 h | — |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP20 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx0 | IPx4 |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 248 mm | 179 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 32 mm |
| Weight | 385 g | 820 g |
