- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- EcoPro20 vs Base
Philips EcoPro20 vs XCell Base
What EcoPro20 does better (2) and where Base wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is EcoPro20 better than Base?
- Weight385 g vs 425 g+10%
- Charging time3 h vs 4 h+33%
Why is Base better than EcoPro20?
- Maximum output220 lm vs 600 lm2.7×
- Battery capacity1,800 mAh vs 2,600 mAh+44%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 220 lm | 600 lm |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 1 | 1 |
| Battery capacity | 1,800 mAh | 2,600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 3.5 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | No | — |
| Charging time | 3 h | 4 h |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP20 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx0 | — |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 248 mm | 190 mm |
| Weight | 385 g | 425 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | — | Blue, Black |
