How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,158 models · updated Oct 24, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. 3.5426 vs 514652F

Scangrip 3.5426 vs Underwater Kinetics 514652F

What 3.5426 does better (0) and where 514652F wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Scangrip 3.5426
Scangrip · 20213.5426
3.6Score
0 advantages≈ $35
vs
Underwater Kinetics 514652F
Underwater Kinetics · 2021514652F
4.1Score
1 advantage≈ $55
Higher score
2.6Brightness & throw5.7
2.6Build & durability2.6

Why is 3.5426 better than 514652F?

3.5426 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is 514652F better than 3.5426?

  1. Maximum output150 lm vs 170 lm+13%
Specifications

Side by side

Scangrip 3.5426Scangrip 3.5426≈ $353.6
Light output
Maximum output150 lm170 lm
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)—192 m
Light sourceLEDLED
Battery & charging
Battery—AA
Number of batteries—4
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Body materialPlastic / polymerPlastic / polymer
Modes & features
Colours—Yellow, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare