- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- 514652F vs 515405
Underwater Kinetics 514652F vs Underwater Kinetics 515405
What 514652F does better (2) and where 515405 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is 514652F better than 515405?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)192 m vs 65 m3×
- Maximum output170 lm vs 70 lm2.4×
Why is 515405 better than 514652F?
515405 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 170 lm | 70 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 192 m | 65 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | AA |
| Number of batteries | 4 | 2 |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Yellow, Black | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Ledlenser EXH8vsUnderwater Kinetics 514652F3.74.0
vs
Ledlenser Solidline SH6RvsUnderwater Kinetics 514652F
vs
Silva Scout 3XTHvsUnderwater Kinetics 514652F4.24.0
vs
Underwater Kinetics 514652FvsLedlenser iH6
vs
Fenix HL18R-TvsUnderwater Kinetics 514652F4.24.0
vs
Ledlenser EXH8vsUnderwater Kinetics 5154053.73.6
