- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- D20 2.0 vs Shark
Acebeam D20 2.0 vs Oceama Shark
What D20 2.0 does better (1) and where Shark wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is D20 2.0 better than Shark?
- Submersible to200 m vs 100 m2×
Why is Shark better than D20 2.0?
- Maximum runtime0.5 h vs 1.5 h3×
- Maximum output2,200 lm vs 2,500 lm+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,200 lm | 2,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 62,500 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 500 m | — |
| Runtime at maximum output | 15 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-40 | Cree XHP50.2 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 26650 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 0.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 200 m | 100 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 200 mm |
| Weight | — | 496 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
