- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E10 2.0 vs LD30 RENEGADE
Acebeam E10 2.0 vs Fenix LD30 RENEGADE
What E10 2.0 does better (3) and where LD30 RENEGADE wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Brightness & throw4.4
8.5Battery & charging9.0
7.3Build & durability8.3
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
E10 2.0LD30 RENEGADE
| E10 2.0 | LD30 RENEGADE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 88 mm | 116.4 mm | −28.4 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 25.4 mm | +14.6 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.5 mm | 22.2 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Weight | 106 g | 118 g | −12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E10 2.0 better than LD30 RENEGADE?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)241 m vs 203 m+19%
- Peak beam intensity14,520 cd vs 10,300 cd+41%
- Weight106 g vs 118 g+11%
Why is LD30 RENEGADE better than E10 2.0?
- Maximum runtime120 h vs 262.4 h2.2×
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 1,800 lm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 1,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,520 cd | 10,300 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 241 m | 203 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 120 h | 262.4 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Can tail-stand | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 88 mm | 116.4 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.5 mm | 22.2 mm |
| Weight | 106 g | 118 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
