- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E10 2.0 vs PD26R ACE
Acebeam E10 2.0 vs Fenix PD26R ACE
What E10 2.0 does better (0) and where PD26R ACE wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is E10 2.0 better than PD26R ACE?
E10 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is PD26R ACE better than E10 2.0?
- Maximum runtime120 h vs 556 h4.6×
- Peak beam intensity14,520 cd vs 31,330 cd2.2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)241 m vs 354 m+47%
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 1,300 lm+8%
- Weight106 g vs 102 g+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,520 cd | 31,330 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 241 m | 354 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SFT-25R |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | 18350 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 120 h | 556 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 88 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 106 g | 102 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
