- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E10 2.0 vs SW06R
Acebeam E10 2.0 vs Fenix SW06R
What E10 2.0 does better (5) and where SW06R wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E10 2.0SW06R
| E10 2.0 | SW06R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 88 mm | 98.9 mm | −10.9 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 39 mm | +1 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.5 mm | 20.6 mm | +3.9 mm |
| Weight | 106 g | 88 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E10 2.0 better than SW06R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)241 m vs 100 m2.4×
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 500 lm2.4×
- Peak beam intensity14,520 cd vs 2,500 cd5.8×
- Maximum runtime120 h vs 63.6 h+89%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
Why is SW06R better than E10 2.0?
- Weight106 g vs 88 g+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,520 cd | 2,500 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 241 m | 100 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,300 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 120 h | 63.6 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP66 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx6 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | Yes |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 88 mm | 98.9 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 39 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.5 mm | 20.6 mm |
| Weight | 106 g | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
