- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E10 2.0 vs TrailSight
Acebeam E10 2.0 vs Nitecore TrailSight
What E10 2.0 does better (3) and where TrailSight wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Brightness & throw7.0
8.5Battery & charging4.8
7.3Build & durability5.3
Why is E10 2.0 better than TrailSight?
- Maximum runtime120 h vs 46 h2.6×
- Weight106 g vs 121 g+14%
- Impact resistance (drop)1.5 m vs 1 m+50%
Why is TrailSight better than E10 2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)241 m vs 530 m2.2×
- Peak beam intensity14,520 cd vs 70,347 cd4.8×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,520 cd | 70,347 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 241 m | 530 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | NiteLab UHi 20 |
| LED maker | Cree | NiteLab |
| Colour temperature | — | 4,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 120 h | 46 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | 1 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Magnesium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 88 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 106 g | 121 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
