How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. EC50 III vs UB18DJLL0Z

Acebeam EC50 III vs Hikoki UB18DJLL0Z

What EC50 III does better (1) and where UB18DJLL0Z wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam EC50 III
Acebeam · 2018EC50 III
9.4Score
1 advantage
Higher score
vs
Hikoki UB18DJLL0Z
Hikoki · 2019UB18DJLL0Z
0 advantages≈ $40
9.7Battery & charging5.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

EC50 IIIUB18DJLL0Z
40 × 13278 × 205
EC50 IIIUB18DJLL0ZDifference
Length / height132 mm205 mm−73 mm
Head diameter / width40 mm78 mm−38 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is EC50 III better than UB18DJLL0Z?

  1. Maximum runtime1,200 h vs 51 h23.5×

Why is UB18DJLL0Z better than EC50 III?

UB18DJLL0Z has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Light output
Maximum output3,850 lm—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)326 m—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
Number of LEDs112
Battery & charging
Battery26650 Li-ionBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Number of batteries—1
Maximum runtime1,200 h51 h
RechargeableYesYes
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx8—
Submersible to2 m—
Body materialAluminium—
Size & weight
Length / height132 mm205 mm
Head diameter / width40 mm78 mm
Weight120 g—
Modes & features
StrobeYes—
SOS / beaconYes—
ColoursBlackGreen, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare