- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- EC50 III vs T102
Acebeam EC50 III vs Wuben T102
What EC50 III does better (1) and where T102 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is EC50 III better than T102?
- Maximum output3,850 lm vs 3,500 lm+10%
Why is T102 better than EC50 III?
T102 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,850 lm | 3,500 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 326 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XHP70.2 |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 26650 Li-ion | — |
| Maximum runtime | 1,200 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 132 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | — |
| Weight | 120 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
