- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H17 2.0 vs HL18R-T V2.0
Acebeam H17 2.0 vs Fenix HL18R-T V2.0
What H17 2.0 does better (6) and where HL18R-T V2.0 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Brightness & throw5.8
9.5Battery & charging7.5
8.2Light quality3.4
5.9Features5.9
Why is H17 2.0 better than HL18R-T V2.0?
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 800 lm2.5×
- Weight73 g vs 103 g+41%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)128 m vs 125 m+2%
- Maximum runtime170 h vs 160 h+6%
- Peak beam intensity4,100 cd vs 3,910 cd+5%
- Colour rendering (CRI)90 vs 80+12%
Why is HL18R-T V2.0 better than H17 2.0?
HL18R-T V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,100 cd | 3,910 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 128 m | 125 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SST-25 |
| LED maker | — | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | 3 | 2 |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | 80 |
| Colour temperature | 4,000K | 6,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18350 Li-ion | AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,900 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 170 h | 160 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 79 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | — | 57.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 47 mm |
| Weight | 73 g | 103 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
