- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H17 2.0 vs Halo AL350C
Acebeam H17 2.0 vs Fox Halo AL350C
What H17 2.0 does better (1) and where Halo AL350C wins (0) — every spec side by side.
7.1Brightness & throw6.3
Why is H17 2.0 better than Halo AL350C?
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 500 lm4×
Why is Halo AL350C better than H17 2.0?
Halo AL350C has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,100 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 128 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 3 | 1 |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 4,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18350 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 170 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 79 mm | — |
| Weight | 73 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
