- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H17 2.0 vs HM53R
Acebeam H17 2.0 vs Fenix HM53R
What H17 2.0 does better (3) and where HM53R wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is H17 2.0 better than HM53R?
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 1,200 lm+67%
- Weight73 g vs 102 g+40%
- Maximum runtime170 h vs 135 h+26%
Why is HM53R better than H17 2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)128 m vs 158 m+23%
- Peak beam intensity4,100 cd vs 6,240 cd+52%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,100 cd | 6,240 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 128 m | 158 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SST-25 |
| LED maker | — | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | 3 | 2 |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 4,000K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18350 Li-ion | 18350 Li-ion, 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 170 h | 135 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | Yes |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 79 mm | 71 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 37 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 36 mm |
| Weight | 73 g | 102 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Side switch |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
