- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H17 2.0 vs HM65R V2.0
Acebeam H17 2.0 vs Fenix HM65R V2.0
What H17 2.0 does better (1) and where HM65R V2.0 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Brightness & throw9.0
9.5Battery & charging8.8
9.7Build & durability7.6
5.9Features5.9
Why is H17 2.0 better than HM65R V2.0?
- Weight73 g vs 144 g+97%
Why is HM65R V2.0 better than H17 2.0?
- Peak beam intensity4,100 cd vs 13,220 cd3.2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)128 m vs 230 m+80%
- Maximum runtime170 h vs 296 h+74%
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 2,200 lm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 2,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,100 cd | 13,220 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 128 m | 230 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | — | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | 3 | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 4,000K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18350 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,400 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 170 h | 296 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Magnesium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 79 mm | 80 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 39.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 52.5 mm |
| Weight | 73 g | 144 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
