- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Halo AL350C vs Nao LT
Fox Halo AL350C vs Petzl Nao LT
What Halo AL350C does better (1) and where Nao LT wins (1) — every spec side by side.
6.3Brightness & throw4.6
Why is Halo AL350C better than Nao LT?
- Charging time3 h vs 3.5 h+17%
Why is Nao LT better than Halo AL350C?
- Maximum output500 lm vs 600 lm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 500 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 1,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 75 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 85 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | 3 h | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 90 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
