- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H17 2.0 vs HA29 UHE MCT
Acebeam H17 2.0 vs Nitecore HA29 UHE MCT
What H17 2.0 does better (3) and where HA29 UHE MCT wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Brightness & throw7.3
9.5Battery & charging7.9
9.7Build & durability7.8
8.2Light quality5.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is H17 2.0 better than HA29 UHE MCT?
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 1,200 lm+67%
- Weight73 g vs 112 g+53%
- Maximum runtime170 h vs 122 h+39%
Why is HA29 UHE MCT better than H17 2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)128 m vs 169 m+32%
- Peak beam intensity4,100 cd vs 7,140 cd+74%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,100 cd | 7,140 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 128 m | 169 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 3 | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 4,000K | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18350 Li-ion | AAA |
| Maximum runtime | 170 h | 122 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 79 mm | — |
| Weight | 73 g | 112 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
