- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H17 2.0 vs HC60 UHE
Acebeam H17 2.0 vs Nitecore HC60 UHE
What H17 2.0 does better (2) and where HC60 UHE wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is H17 2.0 better than HC60 UHE?
- Weight73 g vs 140 g+92%
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 1,600 lm+25%
Why is HC60 UHE better than H17 2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)128 m vs 157 m+23%
- Peak beam intensity4,100 cd vs 6,170 cd+50%
- Maximum runtime170 h vs 200 h+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,100 cd | 6,170 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 128 m | 157 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 3 | 6 |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 4,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18350 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 170 h | 200 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 79 mm | — |
| Weight | 73 g | 140 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
