- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H50 2.0 vs HM71R
Acebeam H50 2.0 vs Fenix HM71R
What H50 2.0 does better (1) and where HM71R wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is H50 2.0 better than HM71R?
- Weight94 g vs 208 g2.2×
Why is HM71R better than H50 2.0?
- Peak beam intensity4,968 cd vs 13,220 cd2.7×
- Maximum runtime40 h vs 400 h10×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)141 m vs 230 m+63%
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 2,700 lm+35%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 2,700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,968 cd | 13,220 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 141 m | 230 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 240 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | Luminus SFT-70 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | 3 | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | — | 90 |
| Colour temperature | 5,000K | 6,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 21700 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 40 h | 400 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 85 mm | 106 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 46 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 45 mm |
| Weight | 94 g | 208 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
