- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H50 2.0 vs Nao RL
Acebeam H50 2.0 vs Petzl Nao RL
What H50 2.0 does better (2) and where Nao RL wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is H50 2.0 better than Nao RL?
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 1,500 lm+33%
- Weight94 g vs 145 g+54%
Why is Nao RL better than H50 2.0?
- Peak beam intensity4,968 cd vs 10,000 cd2×
- Maximum runtime40 h vs 80 h2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)141 m vs 200 m+42%
- Runtime at maximum output240 min vs 1,440 min6×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 1,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,968 cd | 10,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 141 m | 200 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 240 min | 1,440 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 3 | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,200 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 40 h | 80 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 85 mm | — |
| Weight | 94 g | 145 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
