- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- K75 2.0 vs L35 2.0
Acebeam K75 2.0 vs Acebeam L35 2.0
What K75 2.0 does better (3) and where L35 2.0 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is K75 2.0 better than L35 2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)2,716 m vs 650 m4.2×
- Peak beam intensity1,844,164 cd vs 105,620 cd17.5×
- Maximum output6,500 lm vs 5,000 lm+30%
Why is L35 2.0 better than K75 2.0?
- Maximum runtime31 h vs 288 h9.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 6,500 lm | 5,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,844,164 cd | 105,620 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 2,716 m | 650 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 1 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XHP70.3 HI |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 21700 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 31 h | 288 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Tail switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
