- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- K75 2.0 vs LR40R V2.0
Acebeam K75 2.0 vs Fenix LR40R V2.0
What K75 2.0 does better (2) and where LR40R V2.0 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Brightness & throw9.1
5.9Features5.9
Why is K75 2.0 better than LR40R V2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)2,716 m vs 900 m3×
- Peak beam intensity1,844,164 cd vs 202,500 cd9.1×
Why is LR40R V2.0 better than K75 2.0?
- Maximum output6,500 lm vs 15,000 lm2.3×
- Maximum runtime31 h vs 177 h5.7×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 6,500 lm | 15,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,844,164 cd | 202,500 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 2,716 m | 900 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 1 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SFT-70 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | — | 6 |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 31 h | 177 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 175 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 82 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 55 mm |
| Weight | — | 842 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 16 |
| Switch | — | Rotary / scroll wheel |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
