- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- K75 2.0 vs P20
Acebeam K75 2.0 vs Acebeam P20
What K75 2.0 does better (3) and where P20 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is K75 2.0 better than P20?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)2,716 m vs 1,454 m+87%
- Peak beam intensity1,844,164 cd vs 528,529 cd3.5×
- Maximum output6,500 lm vs 5,600 lm+16%
Why is P20 better than K75 2.0?
- Maximum runtime31 h vs 74 h2.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 6,500 lm | 5,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,844,164 cd | 528,529 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 2,716 m | 1,454 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 1 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 31 h | 74 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1.5 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
