- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- K75 2.0 vs W35 LC DEL
Acebeam K75 2.0 vs Acebeam W35 LC DEL
What K75 2.0 does better (4) and where W35 LC DEL wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Brightness & throw7.2
5.9Features5.9
Why is K75 2.0 better than W35 LC DEL?
- Maximum output6,500 lm vs 800 lm8.1×
- Maximum runtime31 h vs 4 h7.8×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)2,716 m vs 2,600 m+4%
- Peak beam intensity1,844,164 cd vs 1,690,000 cd+9%
Why is W35 LC DEL better than K75 2.0?
- Runtime at maximum output1 min vs 6 min6×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 6,500 lm | 800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,844,164 cd | 1,690,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 2,716 m | 2,600 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 1 min | 6 min |
| Light source | LED | LEP (laser-excited phosphor) |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Maximum runtime | 31 h | 4 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
