- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- K75 2.0 vs LR36R
Acebeam K75 2.0 vs Fenix LR36R
What K75 2.0 does better (2) and where LR36R wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is K75 2.0 better than LR36R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)2,716 m vs 1,260 m2.2×
- Peak beam intensity1,844,164 cd vs 396,900 cd4.6×
Why is LR36R better than K75 2.0?
- Maximum runtime31 h vs 102 h3.3×
- Maximum output6,500 lm vs 10,000 lm+54%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 6,500 lm | 10,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,844,164 cd | 396,900 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 2,716 m | 1,260 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 1 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LEP (laser-excited phosphor) |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SST-25 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | — | 25 |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 21700 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 31 h | 102 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 160.7 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 56.2 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 55.1 mm |
| Weight | — | 493 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| Switch | — | Rotary / scroll wheel |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Laser pointer / aiming laser | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
