How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. K75 2.0 vs P40

Acebeam K75 2.0 vs Nitecore P40

What K75 2.0 does better (2) and where P40 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam K75 2.0
Acebeam · 2023K75 2.0
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
vs
Nitecore P40
Nitecore · 2025P40
7.6Score
2 advantages≈ $340
9.0Brightness & throw8.7

Why is K75 2.0 better than P40?

  1. Maximum output6,500 lm vs 2,000 lm3.2×
  2. Maximum runtime31 h vs 20 h+55%

Why is P40 better than K75 2.0?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)2,716 m vs 2,900 m+7%
  2. Peak beam intensity1,844,164 cd vs 2,102,500 cd+14%
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam K75 2.0Acebeam K75 2.0≈ $3509.4
Nitecore P40Nitecore P40≈ $3407.6
Light output
Maximum output6,500 lm2,000 lm
Peak beam intensity1,844,164 cd2,102,500 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)2,716 m2,900 m
Runtime at maximum output1 min—
Light sourceLEDLED + LEP
LED & beam
LED makerLuminus—
Battery & charging
Battery capacity—5,500 mAh
Maximum runtime31 h20 h
Rechargeable—Yes
USB-C charging—Yes
Battery level indicator—Yes
Build & durability
Protection rating—IP68
Water protection (IPx)—IPx8
Impact resistance (drop)—1 m
Size & weight
Weight—390 g
Modes & features
StrobeYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare