- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- K75 2.0 vs TM20K
Acebeam K75 2.0 vs Nitecore TM20K
What K75 2.0 does better (0) and where TM20K wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is K75 2.0 better than TM20K?
K75 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TM20K better than K75 2.0?
- Maximum output6,500 lm vs 20,000 lm3.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 6,500 lm | 20,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,844,164 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 2,716 m | — |
| Runtime at maximum output | 1 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 19 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | — | 9,600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 31 h | — |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 4.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
