- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- L19 2.0 vs TK22R
Acebeam L19 2.0 vs Fenix TK22R
What L19 2.0 does better (3) and where TK22R wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
L19 2.0TK22R
| L19 2.0 | TK22R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 163.8 mm | 158 mm | +5.8 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 60 mm | 40 mm | +20 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm | = |
| Weight | 205 g | 218 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is L19 2.0 better than TK22R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)1,080 m vs 480 m2.2×
- Peak beam intensity291,600 cd vs 57,600 cd5.1×
- Weight205 g vs 218 g+6%
Why is TK22R better than L19 2.0?
- Maximum output2,200 lm vs 3,200 lm+45%
- Maximum runtime47 h vs 50 h+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,200 lm | 3,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 291,600 cd | 57,600 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 1,080 m | 480 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-40 | Luminus SST-70 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 47 h | 50 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 163.8 mm | 158 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 60 mm | 40 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 218 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
