- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- L19 2.0 vs TA30C
Acebeam L19 2.0 vs Nextorch TA30C
What L19 2.0 does better (3) and where TA30C wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
L19 2.0TA30C
| L19 2.0 | TA30C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 163.8 mm | 136 mm | +27.8 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 60 mm | 30 mm | +30 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 23 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 97 g | +108 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is L19 2.0 better than TA30C?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)1,080 m vs 303 m3.6×
- Peak beam intensity291,600 cd vs 22,950 cd12.7×
- Maximum output2,200 lm vs 1,600 lm+38%
Why is TA30C better than L19 2.0?
- Weight205 g vs 97 g2.1×
- Maximum runtime47 h vs 50 h+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,200 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 291,600 cd | 22,950 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 1,080 m | 303 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | — |
| Maximum runtime | 47 h | 50 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 163.8 mm | 136 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 60 mm | 30 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 23 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 97 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Tail switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
