- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- L35 2.0 vs EDC27
Acebeam L35 2.0 vs Nitecore EDC27
What L35 2.0 does better (3) and where EDC27 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is L35 2.0 better than EDC27?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)650 m vs 305 m2.1×
- Peak beam intensity105,620 cd vs 23,260 cd4.5×
- Maximum output5,000 lm vs 3,100 lm+61%
Why is EDC27 better than L35 2.0?
EDC27 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 5,000 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 105,620 cd | 23,260 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 650 m | 305 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.3 HI | NiteLab UHi 20 |
| LED maker | Cree | NiteLab |
| Number of LEDs | — | 20 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | — |
| Maximum runtime | 288 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
