- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- L35 2.0 vs EDC35
Acebeam L35 2.0 vs Nitecore EDC35
What L35 2.0 does better (3) and where EDC35 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is L35 2.0 better than EDC35?
- Maximum runtime288 h vs 90 h3.2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)650 m vs 550 m+18%
- Peak beam intensity105,620 cd vs 75,620 cd+40%
Why is EDC35 better than L35 2.0?
EDC35 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 5,000 lm | 5,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 105,620 cd | 75,620 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 650 m | 550 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.3 HI | NiteLab UHi 40 MAX |
| LED maker | Cree | NiteLab |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 6,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 288 h | 90 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Can tail-stand | — | Yes |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Tail switch | Tail switch |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
