- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- L35 2.0 vs MH25 Pro
Acebeam L35 2.0 vs Nitecore MH25 Pro
What L35 2.0 does better (1) and where MH25 Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is L35 2.0 better than MH25 Pro?
- Maximum output5,000 lm vs 3,300 lm+52%
Why is MH25 Pro better than L35 2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)650 m vs 705 m+8%
- Peak beam intensity105,620 cd vs 124,260 cd+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 5,000 lm | 3,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 105,620 cd | 124,260 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 650 m | 705 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.3 HI | NiteLab UHi 40 |
| LED maker | Cree | NiteLab |
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,300 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 288 h | — |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Head diameter / width | — | 40 mm |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
